city of San Antonio


Some of our meetings have moved. View additional meetings.

File #: 15-2230   
Type: Zoning Case
In control: City Council A Session
On agenda: 4/16/2015
Posting Language: ZONING CASE # Z2015111 HL (District 1): An Ordinance amending the Zoning District Boundary from "RM-4 AHOD" Residential Mixed Airport Hazard Overlay District to "RM-4 HL AHOD" Residential Mixed Historic Landmark Airport Hazard Overlay District on the West 55 feet of the East 60 feet of Lots 15 and 16, Block D, NCB 2557 located at 227 Daniel Street. Staff and Zoning Commission recommend Approval.
Attachments: 1. Location Map, 2. Statement of Significance & Certificate of Appropriateness, 3. Z2015111 HL_Minutes, 4. DRAFT ORDINANCE, 5. Ordinance 2015-04-16-0322
DEPARTMENT: Development Services      
 
DEPARTMENT HEAD: Roderick Sanchez
      
COUNCIL DISTRICTS IMPACTED: Council District 2
 
SUBJECT:
Zoning Case Z2015111 HL
 
SUMMARY:
Current Zoning:  "RM-4 AHOD" Residential Mixed Airport Hazard Overlay District
 
Requested Zoning:  "RM-4 HL AHOD" Residential Mixed Historic Landmark Airport Hazard Overlay District
 
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Zoning Commission Hearing Date:  March 17, 2015
 
Case Manager:  Mary Moralez-Gonzales, Planner
 
Property Owner:  Lance Williamson and Rodolfo Zapata
 
Applicant:  City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation
 
Representative:  City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation
 
Location:  227 Daniel Street
 
Legal Description:  West 55 feet of east 60 feet of Lots 15 and 16, Block D, NCB 2557
 
Total Acreage:  0.101
 
Notices Mailed
Owners of Property within 200 feet:  26
Registered Neighborhood Associations within 200 feet: Lone Star Community Plan and King William Historic District
Planning Team:  Downtown Neighborhood Plan
Applicable Agencies:  City of San Antonio Office of Historic Preservation
 
Property Details
Property History:  The subject property is located within the city limits as recognized in 1938 and was originally zoned "C" Apartment District. In a 1993 City-initiated zoning case, the property was rezoned to "R-2" Two Family Residence District. Upon adoption of the 2001 Unified Development Code, the previous base zoning district converted to the current "RM-4 AHOD" Residential Mixed Airport Hazard Overlay District.
According to the Office of Historic Preservation, the existing structure appears to have been constructed circa 1908.    
      
Topography:  The property does not include any abnormal physical features such as slope or inclusion in a flood plain.
 
Adjacent Base Zoning and Land Uses
Direction:  North
Current Base Zoning:  "RM-4"
Current Land Uses:  Single-Family Residences
 
Direction:  East
Current Base Zoning:  "I-2 HS RIO-4"
Current Land Uses:  Pioneer Flour Mill, Guenther House
 
Direction:  South
Current Base Zoning:  "RM-4"
Current Land Uses:  Single-Family Residences
 
Direction:  West
Current Base Zoning:  "RM-4" and "RM-4 HS"
Current Land Uses:  Single-Family Residences
 
Overlay and Special District Information:  All surrounding properties carry the "AHOD" Airport Hazard Overlay District, due to their proximity to an airport or approach path.  The "AHOD" does not restrict permitted uses, but can require additional review of construction plans by both the Development Services Department and the Federal Aviation Administration.
 
Transportation
Thoroughfare:  Daniel Street
Existing Character: Local Street; 1 lane in each direction with sidewalks
Proposed Changes:  None known
 
Thoroughfare:  South Main Avenue
Existing Character: Local Street; 1 lane in each direction with sidewalks
Proposed Changes:  None known
 
Public Transit:  Nearby VIA bus routes operate at the corner of South Main Avenue and South Alamo as well as at the corner of South Flores and South Alamo.
 
Traffic Impact:  A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required.
 
Parking Information:  There is no change of use proposed.  The property is used as a single-family residence.  Minimum Parking Requirement: 1space per unit. Maximum Parking Requirement: N/A
 
ISSUE:
None.
 
ALTERNATIVES:
A denial of the request will result in the subject property retaining the current residential single-family zoning classification, restricting future land uses to those permissible in the "RM-4" zoning district and the property will not be designated as Historic.
 
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
 
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Analysis and Recommendation:  Staff and Zoning Commission (7-0) recommend Approval.
 
Criteria for Review:  According to Section 35-421, zoning amendments shall be based on the approval criteria below.
 
1.  Consistency:  
The subject property is located within the Lone Star Community Plan and is currently designated as Low Density Residential in the future land use component of the plan. Requests for Historic Landmark designations do not change either the existing base zoning district or uses permitted by-right; therefore, a finding of consistency is not required.
 
2.  Adverse Impacts on Neighboring Lands:  
Granting of the "HL" Historic Landmark designation will not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood. Historic designation does not affect the range of permitted uses, but does regulate the exterior aesthetic of the structure and any new construction. The purpose of the requested zoning change is to protect and preserve the structure and make the property eligible for tax incentives for rehabilitation.
 
3.  Suitability as Presently Zoned:  
The "RM-4" base zoning district is consistent with the adopted land use designation and the surrounding zoning and uses.  There is no change proposed for the base zoning district.
 
4.  Health, Safety and Welfare:  
Staff has found no indication of likely adverse effects on the public health, safety, or welfare.
 
5.  Public Policy:  
The request does not appear to conflict with any public policy objective.
 
6.  Size of Tract:  
The size of the subject property is not an issue for the consideration of historic landmark designation.
 
7.  Other Factors:  
On January 7, 2015, the Historic and Design Review Commission issued a Certificate of Appropriateness identifying the property as historically significant based on criteria listed in Section 35-607 of the Unified Development Code.  The four criteria identified as being applicable to the subject property are specified in the attached Certificate of Appropriateness and Statement of Significance.
This request for Historic Landmark designation was initiated by the property owner.