city of San Antonio


Some of our meetings have moved. View additional meetings.

File #: 15-3112   
Type: Zoning Case
In control: City Council A Session
On agenda: 6/4/2015
Posting Language: ZONING CASE # Z2015161 (Council District 2): An Ordinance amending the Zoning District Boundary from "RM-4 AHOD" Residential Mixed Airport Hazard Overlay District to "IDZ AHOD" Infill Development Zone Airport Hazard Overlay District with uses permitted in "RM-4" Residential Mixed District and "O-1" Office District on Lot 8, Block 15, NCB 1534 located at 1614 Martin Luther King Drive. Staff and Zoning Commission recommend Approval.
Attachments: 1. Z2015161 Location Map, 2. Z2015161_site plan, 3. Z2015161_Zoning Minutes, 4. DRAFT ORDINANCE, 5. Ordinance 2015-06-04-0497
Related files: 15-2844, 15-2513
DEPARTMENT: Development Services
 
DEPARTMENT HEAD: Roderick Sanchez      
 
COUNCIL DISTRICTS IMPACTED: 2
 
SUBJECT:
Zoning Case Z2015161
 
SUMMARY:
Current Zoning:  "RM-4 AHOD" Residential Mixed Airport Hazard Overlay District
 
Requested Zoning:  "IDZ AHOD" Infill Development Airport Hazard Overlay District with uses permitted in "RM-4" Residential Mixed District and "O-1" Office District             
 
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Zoning Commission Hearing Date:  May 5, 2015
 
Case Manager:  Oscar Aguilera, Planner
 
Property Owner:  John and Irma Nelson
 
Applicant:  John and Irma Nelson
 
Representative:  John and Irma Nelson
 
Location:  1614 Martin Luther King Drive
 
Legal Description:  Lot 8 Block 15 NCB 1534.
 
Total Acreage:  0.1695
 
Notices Mailed
Owners of Property within 200 feet:  24
Registered Neighborhood Associations within 200 feet:  Denver Heights
Planning Team:  Arena District/Eastside Community Plan - 22
Applicable Agencies: None
 
Property Details
Property History:  The property is located within the City of San Antonio's Original Thirty-Six Square Mile. The property was originally zoned as "J" Commercial District (1938 Zoning District). On December 16, 1993, the property was rezoned from "J" Commercial District to "R-2" Two-Family Residential District (Ordinance 79329). Upon the adoption of the 2001 Unified Development Code, the zoning district changed to "RM-4" Residential Mixed District classification.
      
Topography:  The subject property does not include any abnormal physical features such as significant slope or inclusion in a flood plain.
 
Adjacent Base Zoning and Land Uses
Direction:  East and North
Current Base Zoning:  "RM-4", "C-3R", "RM-4 S"
Current Land Uses:  single-family homes, and two-family dwellings, apartments, Auto Repairs, parking lot, and college.  
 
Direction:  West, South
Current Base Zoning:  "RM-4", and "C-1"
Current Land Uses:  single-family homes, and two-family dwellings, apartments, barbershop, and party rentals.
 
Overlay and Special District Information:  All surrounding properties carry the "AHOD" Airport Hazard Overlay District, due to their proximity to an airport or approach path. The "AHOD does not restrict permitted uses, but can require additional review of construction plans by both the Development Services Department and the Federal Aviation Administration.
 
Transportation
Thoroughfare:  Martin Luther King Drive
Existing Character:  Secondary Arterial Type B 70' - 86'.
Proposed Changes:  None known.
 
Thoroughfare:  Meerscheidt Street
Existing Character:  Local Street.
Proposed Changes:  None known
 
Public Transit:  There is a VIA bus stop located at the intersection of Martin Luther King Drive at South Geverst Street (Route 26), one city block from the subject property.
 
Traffic Impact:  A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required. The traffic generated by the proposed development does not exceed the threshold requirements.
 
Parking Information:  Dwelling - 4 Family cluster parking: 1.5 per unit. Maximum Parking Requirement: 2 per unit.
Parking Information:  Professional Office: 1- per 300 sf. GFA. Maximum Parking Requirement: 1 per 140 sf. GFA
The "IDZ" Infill Development Zone District eliminates off-street vehicle parking requirements. The zoning application refers to a professional office mixed use development, with the inclusion of a small residential unit. The preliminary site plan proposes 5 parking spaces which include one ADA accessible parking space.
 
ISSUE:
None.
 
ALTERNATIVES:
Denial of the zoning request will result in the subject property retaining the "RM-4 AHOD" Residential Mixed Airport Hazard Overlay District zoning.
 
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
 
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff and Zoning Commission (8-0) recommend approval.
 
Criteria for Review:  According to Section 35-421, zoning amendments shall be based on the approval criteria below.
 
1.  Consistency:  
The property is located within the Arena District/Eastside Community Plan and is designated as a "Medium Density Residential" land use. The requested "IDZ AHOD" Infill Development Airport Hazard Overlay District with uses permitted in "RM-4" Residential Mixed District and "O-1" Office base zoning district are not consistent with the adopted land use designation. The applicant has applied for a Plan Amendment to change the designation to "Mixed Use" land use. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Plan Amendment.      
 
2.  Adverse Impacts on Neighboring Lands:  
Staff has found no evidence of likely adverse impacts on surrounding properties.
 
3.  Suitability as Presently Zoned:  
The development meets the intent of the "IDZ" Infill Development Zone which is to encourage and facilitate development on a redevelopment of underutilized buildings or structures within existing built-up areas. The property is currently zoned "RM-4" Mixed Residential District but the property includes a warehouse/garage on the property. The proposed "Mixed Use" land use classification will provide consistency with the surrounding area and allow the applicant to seek the appropriate zoning of "IDZ" with uses permitted in the "RM-4" Residential Mixed District.  
 
4.  Health, Safety and Welfare:  
Staff has found no indication of likely adverse effects on the public health, safety, or welfare.
 
5.  Public Policy:  
The request does not appear to conflict with any public policy objective.  
 
6.  Size of Tract:  
The subject property is 0.1695 acres in size, which accommodates the proposed development with adequate space for parking.
 
7.  Other Factors:  
None.