DEPARTMENT: Development Services Department
DEPARTMENT HEAD: Roderick Sanchez, CBO, AICP
COUNCIL DISTRICTS IMPACTED: Citywide
SUBJECT:
Amendment proposals to the Unified Development Code (UDC) submitted by an Individual or Public/Private Organization.
SUMMARY:
Consideration of proposed UDC amendments submitted by an Individual or Public/Private Organization in accordance with Section 35-111 of the UDC for editing, clarification, or rule interpretation.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On July 13, 2015, the Planning Commission Technical Advisory Committee (PCTAC) considered proposed amendments to the Unified Development Code (UDC) which were submitted by 13 individuals or organizations as part of the UDC five-year update cycle.
The amendments were considered for their conformity to the specifications outlined in Section 35-111 of the UDC which requires that amendments submitted by parties other than those from city agencies, boards, and commissions, be either editing or clarification.
ISSUE:
The PCTAC reviewed and made a recommendation for each amendment, and have forwarded these recommendations to the Planning Commission for consideration. For each amendment, the Planning Commission may determine one of the following options:
1) That the amendment is of a clarification or editing nature and the amendment will move forward for detailed consideration by the PCTAC and will move forward in the process
2) That the amendment is not of a clarification or editing nature and the amendment will not move forward for detailed consideration by the PCTAC and will not move forward in the process
3) That the amendment is not of a clarification or editing nature but that the amendment should be considered for detailed consideration by the PCTAC and will move forward in the process as an amendment sponsored by the Planning Commission.
See Attachment A for the amendments, with PCTAC Recommendations.
ALTERNATIVES:
For those amendments ...
Click here for full text