|
Case Number: |
A-17-087 |
|
Applicant: |
Victor Santos Velasquez |
|
Owner: |
Victor Santos Velasquez |
|
Council District: |
2 |
|
Location: |
4415 Monaco Drive |
|
Legal Description: |
Lot 25, Block 5, NCB 13510 |
|
Zoning: |
“R-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Airport Hazard Overlay District |
|
Case Manager: |
Shepard Beamon, Senior Planner |
Request
A request for a 30 foot variance from the 30 foot platted front setback, as described in Section 35-516(o), to allow a carport on the front property line.
Executive Summary
The subject property was built in 1966 and included a two-car garage at the time of construction. The applicant began construction of a carport without permits and was cited by Code Enforcement. The carport is not complete; however the posts have been located up to the front property line. The Board previously heard a similar request on the same street, and approved a 20 foot variance for a carport. The carport, thus far, has been constructed of metal and poses little risk of fire spread to adjacent properties.
Subject Property Zoning/Land Use
|
Existing Zoning |
Existing Use |
|
“R-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use
|
Orientation |
Existing Zoning District(s) |
Existing Use |
|
North |
“R-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
|
South |
“R-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
|
East |
“R-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
|
West |
“R-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
Comprehensive Plan Consistency/Neighborhood Association
The property is within the boundaries of the San Antonio International Airport Vicinity Land Use Plan and currently designated Low Density Residential in the future land use component of the plan. The subject property is located within the boundaries of the East Terrell Hills Neighborhood Association and they were asked to comment.
Criteria for Review
According to Section 35-482(e) of the UDC, in order for a variance to be granted, the applicant must demonstrate all of the following
1. The variance is not contrary to the public interest.
The public interest is defined as the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. In this case, the public interest is represented by the front setback requirement. The property is platted with a 30 foot setback and the applicant is seeking to eliminate the entire setback. Staff finds that elimination of the entire setback is contrary to the public interest as it breaks up the continuity and open streetscape by introducing development up to the sidewalk.
Staff finds that allowing the carport to be ten feet from the front property line, which would meet the zoning setback, is not contrary to the public interest.
2. Due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.
Staff can find no special condition that warrants the granting of a variance to eliminate the development standard. Had the applicant have applied for a permit, the homeowner would have been advised on a more appropriate approach to the carport’s development. Additionally, the applicant now has a two car garage. Even if the applicant complied with the ten foot zoning setback, they would still have covered space for four vehicles.
Allowing the applicant to build the carport ten feet from the front property line would still allow the applicant space for multiple vehicles, and remain more consistent with the community.
3. By granting the variance, the spirit of the ordinance will be observed and substantial justice will be done.
The spirit of the ordinance intends to create a more open front yard for homes within the community. Substantial justice will not be served by permitting the applicant to keep the carport on the front property line.
The applicant could build the carport ten feet from the front property line, which would meet the zoning setback.
4. The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized in the zoning district in which the variance is located.
The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized in the “R-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Airport Hazard Overlay District.
5. Such variance will not substantially injure the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property or alter the essential character of the district in which the property is located.
Staff was unable to find another carport on the front property line. The design, as built, conflicts with the essential character of this community.
Allowing the applicant to build the carport ten feet from the front property line would be more consistent with the neighborhood.
6. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located.
Staff was unable to establish any unique circumstance that warrants eliminating the front setback. The applicant’s desire to provide covered space for their vehicles does not outweigh the public interest served by a cohesive streetscape and good community design.
Staff finds that allowing the applicant to place the carport ten feet from the front property line would permit the owner to have some covered protection for at least two vehicles and would be more complimentary to designs within the neighborhood.
Alternative to Applicant’s Request
The applicant would need to comply with the 30 foot platted setback.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends DENIAL with an alternate recommendation of a 20 foot variance from the 30 foot setback to allow the carport to be ten feet from the front property line of the requested variance in A-17-087 based on the following findings of fact:
1. The carport, as designed, detracts from the character of the community;
2. There is no hardship.