city of San Antonio


Some of our meetings have moved. View additional meetings.

File #: 19-1765   
Type: Zoning Case
In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 2/4/2019
Posting Language: BOA 18-900029: A request by Gabriel Elizondo for a 1'8" variance from the 5' setback requirement to allow for a structure to be 3'4" from the side property line, located at 244 Jennings Avenue. Staff recommends Approval. (Council District 5)
Attachments: 1. BOA 18-900029 Attachments
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Case Number:

BOA 18-900029

Applicant:

Gabriel Elizondo

Owner:

Gabriel Elizondo

Council District:

5

Location:

244 Jennings Avenue

Legal Description:

The East 42.5 Feet of Lot 4, Block 16, NCB 3421

Zoning:

“R-5 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Ovelay District

Case Manager:

Mercedes Rivas, Planner

Request

A request for a 1'8" variance from the 5' setback requirement, as described in Section 35-371(a), to allow for a structure to be 3'4" from the side property line.

Executive Summary

The subject property is located at 244 Jennings Avenue. The applicant is requesting a decrease of the rear building setback line for an existing detached accessory structure in order to convert a garage to an accessory dwelling unit.

Code Enforcement History

No violations of the requirements of the UDC were observed upon a staff visit to the site, and there have been no code violations reported.

Permit History

No permits have been issued within the last 10 years.

Subject Property Zoning/Land Use

 

Existing Zoning

Existing Use

“R-5 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Dwelling

 

Surrounding Zoning/Land Use

 

Orientation

Existing Zoning District(s)

Existing Use

North

“R-5 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Dwelling

South

“R-5 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Dwelling

East

“R-5 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Dwelling

West

“R-5 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Dwelling

Comprehensive Plan Consistency/Neighborhood Association

The property is within the Nogalitos/South Zarzamora Plan Plan and is designated “Low Density Residential” in the future land use component of the plan. The subject property is not within a neighborhood association.

Street Classification

Jennings Avenue is classified as a Local Street.

Criteria for Review

According to Section 35-482(e) of the UDC, in order for a variance to be granted, the applicant must demonstrate all of the following:

 

1.                     The variance is not contrary to the public interest.

 

The public interest is defined as the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. In this case, the variance is not contrary to the public interest as the structure will not create water runoff on the adjacent property and will not injure the rights of the adjacent property owners.

 

2.                     Due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.

 

An unnecessary hardship would result from the enforcement of the ordinance as strict enforcement would require the owner of the property to demolish and rebuild the structure in question.

 

3.                     By granting the variance, the spirit of the ordinance will be observed and substantial justice will be done.

 

Substantial justice will be done as the requested setbacks will still provide for a safe development pattern.  The request provides fair and equal access to air and light, and provides for adequate fire separation.

 

4.                     The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized in the district in which the request for a variance is located.

 

The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized in zoning district.

 

5.                     Such variance will not substantially injure the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property or alter the essential character of the district in which the property is located.

 

In older neighborhoods such as this, it is common for accessory units to be located within the side and rear setbacks established by the current Unified Development Code. The request will not detract from the character of the district. The unit in question is in the rear yard, not affecting the public right-of-way. The structure in question does not injure the adjacent property.

 

6.                     The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located.

 

The unique circumstance existing on the property is that the structure in question has already been constructed, and when constructed, was only required to provide a 3’ side and rear setback.

 

Alternative to Applicant’s Request

 

Denial of the variance request would result in the owner having to meet the required five foot side setback.

Staff Recommendation

 

Staff recommends APPROVAL of the requested variances in 18-900029, based on the following findings of fact:

 

1.                     The requested setback provides room for adequate light, air, and maintenance, and;

2.                     The variance is unlikely to detract from the character of the district,  and;

3.                     The variance is unlikely to have a negative impact on the adjacent properties.