city of San Antonio


Some of our meetings have moved. View additional meetings.

File #: 19-1732   
Type: Zoning Case
In control: Zoning Commission
On agenda: 2/5/2019
Posting Language: ZONING CASE # Z-2018-900083 (Council District 2): A request for a change in zoning from "I-1 AHOD” General Industrial Airport Hazard Overlay District and “C-1 AHOD” Light Commercial Airport Hazard Overlay District to "IDZ-3 AHOD" High Intensity Infill Development Zone Airport Hazard Overlay District with uses permitted in "MF-65" Multi-Family District and “C-2” Commercial District and Auto Sales (Full Service) on 1.7484 acres out of NCB 30 and 6583, located at 1510 Hoefgen Avenue. Staff recommends Approval, pending Plan Amendment. (Associated Plan Amendment PA-2018-900026)
Attachments: 1. Site Plan, 2. Location Map
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

DEPARTMENT: Development Services                     

 

DEPARTMENT HEAD: Michael Shannon

                     

COUNCIL DISTRICTS IMPACTED: 2

 

SUBJECT:

Zoning Case Z-2018-900083

(Associated Plan Amendment PA-2018-900026)

 

SUMMARY:

Current Zoning: "I-1 AHOD” General Industrial Airport Hazard Overlay District and “C-1 AHOD” Light Commercial Airport Hazard Overlay District

 

Requested Zoning: "IDZ-3 AHOD" High Intensity Infill Development Zone Airport Hazard Overlay District with uses permitted in "MF-65" Multi-Family District and “C-2” Commercial District and Auto Sales (Full Service)

 

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Zoning Commission Hearing Date: February 5, 2019

 

Case Manager: Dominic Silva, Planner

 

Property Owner: Hoefgen Partners, L.L.P. - Marc Dalmolin

 

Applicant: Brad McMurray

 

Representative: Brad McMurray

 

Location: 1510 Hoefgen Avenue

 

Legal Description: 1.7484 acres out of NCB 30 and NCB 6583

 

Total Acreage: 1.7484

 

Notices Mailed

Owners of Property within 200 feet: 26

Registered Neighborhood Associations within 200 feet: Denver Heights

Applicable Agencies: San Antonio ISD

 

Property Details

Property History: The subject properties were included in the original 36 square miles of the City of San Antonio and were zoned “I-1” Industrial District. The property was converted to “I-1” General Industrial District with the adoption of the 2001 Unified Development Code (UDC), established by Ordinance 93881, on May 3, 2001.

 

 

Topography:  The subject property is not located within the 100-year flood plain.

 

Adjacent Base Zoning and Land Uses

Direction: North

Current Base Zoning:  “I-1”

Current Land Uses: Industrial

 

Direction: East

Current Base Zoning: “C-2”

Current Land Uses: Vacant

 

Direction: South

Current Base Zoning: “RM-4”

Current Land Uses: Residential

 

Direction: West

Current Base Zoning: “I-1”

Current Land Uses: Long Term Truck Storage

 

Overlay and Special District Information: 

"AHOD"

All surrounding properties carry the "AHOD" Airport Hazard Overlay District, due to their proximity to an airport or approach path.  The "AHOD" does not restrict permitted uses, but can require additional review of construction plans by both the Development Services Department and the Federal Aviation Administration.

 

"IDZ"

Infill Development Zone (IDZ) provides flexible standards for developments.  IDZ is to encourage and facilitate development on vacant, bypassed lands, or the redevelopment of underutilized buildings of structures, within existing built-up areas. IDZ may be approved as either a base zoning district or an overlay zoning district.  Standards required in an IDZ district shall apply to either IDZ base zoning or the IDZ overlay district except where otherwise specifically stated.  Typically IDZ gives flexibility to parking requirements, lots sizes, and setbacks.

 

 

Transportation

Thoroughfare:  Hoefgen Avenue

Existing Character:  Local

Proposed Changes:  None Known

Public Transit:  VIA bus routes are not within walking distance of the subject property.

 

Thoroughfare:  West Boyer

Existing Character:  Local

Proposed Changes:  None Known

Public Transit:  VIA bus routes are not within walking distance of the subject property.

 

Traffic Impact:  A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required.

 

Parking Information: Parking is waived through “IDZ”

 

ISSUE:

None.

 

ALTERNATIVES:

Denial of the requested zoning change would result in the subject properties retaining the present zoning district designations.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

 

Proximity to Regional Center/Premium Transit Corridor

The subject property is within a ½ of a mile of the Downtown Regional Center.

 

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends Approval.

 

Criteria for Review:  According to Section 35-421, zoning amendments shall be based on the approval criteria below.

 

1.  Consistency: 

The property is located within the Arena District/Eastside Community Plan, and is currently designated as “Light Industrial” in the future land use component of the plan.  The requested “IDZ-3” base zoning district is not consistent with the future land use designation. The applicant is seeking a Plan Amendment to “Mixed Use.”  Staff recommends Approval.  The Planning Commission recommendation is pending the February 13, 2019 hearing.

 

2.  Adverse Impacts on Neighboring Lands: 

Staff finds no evidence of likely adverse impacts on neighboring lands in relation to this zoning change request. The proposed development is replacing an industrial property with a mixed use development to include multi-family and commercial uses.

 

3.  Suitability as Presently Zoned: 

The current “I-1” General Industrial and “C-1” Light Commercial is an appropriate zoning for the property and surrounding area.

 

4.  Health, Safety and Welfare: 

Staff has not found indication of likely adverse effects on the public health, safety, or welfare.

 

5.  Public Policy: 

The rezoning request does not appear to conflict with the land use goals and strategies of the Arena District/Eastside Community Plan.

 

Arena District/Eastside Community Plan Goals:

 

GOAL 2.1: Establish a land use pattern that is responsive to the existing context and is founded upon realistic market expectations.

GOAL 2.2: Protect the neighborhoods by providing them with the necessary improvements to enable infill development and redevelopment.

GOAL 2.6: Strengthen the community with additional gathering nodes and emphasize the places of significance.

GOAL 4.7: Recommend new light industrial uses in the general location of existing industrial uses and adjacent to residential development, to create an appropriate land use transition.

 

6.  Size of Tract: 

The subject property is 1.7484 acres, which would adequately support a variety of commercial uses and multi-family.

 

7.  Other Factors: 

                     The applicant’s request meets the Master Plan’s Policy for Growth Management - Policy 1g, because it makes physical improvements on an inner city property encouraging redevelopment and infill development.

                     The applicant’s request meets the Master Plan’s Policy for Economic Development - Goal 4, because it targets an area within Loop 410 and the southern sector.

                     The applicant’s request the Master Plan’s Policy for Neighborhoods -  Policy 1d, because it promotes conversion or adaptive reuse of vacant or underutilized commercial buildings to provide affordable infill housing.

                     The applicant’s request the Master Plan’s Policy for Neighborhoods - Policy 2b, because it creates mixed-use districts.

                     The applicant’s request the Master Plan’s Policy for Urban Design - Policy 1c, because it develops zoning that allows mixed-use development (i.e. residential and commercial) to be placed in the same building.

 

This zoning request includes the intention to demolish buildings. In accordance with the San Antonio City Unified Development Code, the Office of Historic Preservation reviews all demolition applications for any property located within the city limits of San Antonio. Approval of a zoning change does not imply approval of or take the place of such demolition review as directed by the UDC. To date, no application for demolition at this address to accommodate the proposed use has been submitted for review to the Office of Historic Preservation.