city of San Antonio


Some of our meetings have moved. View additional meetings.

File #: 19-3005   
Type: Zoning Case
In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 4/1/2019
Posting Language: BOA-18-900027: A request for a special exception to allow a predominately open fence to be 6’ tall along the south and the first 300’ of the west property lines, located at 2735 Austin Highway. Staff recommends Approval. (Council District 2)
Attachments: 1. BOA 19-10300027 Attachments
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Case Number:

BOA-18-900027

Applicant:

Austin Highway Business Center Ltd

Owner:

Austin Highway Business Center Ltd

Council District:

2

Location:

2735 Austin Highway

Legal Description:

Lot 44, NCB 12167

Zoning:

“C-3 MC-3 AHOD” General Commercial Austin Highway Metropolitan Corridor Airport Hazard Overlay District

Case Manager:

Mercedes Rivas, Planner

 

Request

 

A request for a special exception to allow a predominately open fence, as described in Section 35-514, to be 6’ tall along the south and the first 300’ of the west property lines.

 

Executive Summary

 

The subject property is located at 2735 Austin Highway. The applicant applied for a 6 foot tall predominately open fence within the front yard of the property.  The applicant then constructed a chain-link fence along the south and the first 300’ of the west property lines. However, the property is within the Austin Highway Metropolitan Corridor Overlay District which includes standards related to the types of fencing permitted within the overlay district.  Chain link fences along with fences clad with wooden rails, concrete or cedar pickets are prohibited by MC-3 design standards.  Permissible fencing materials include brick, rock, stucco or ornamental iron.  If approved for the 6 foot fence, the applicant will be required to modify the chain link material to a material that is permitted.

 

Code Enforcement History:

 

No Code Enforcement history exists on the property.

 

Permit History:

 

No permit history related to this proposed fence exists on the property. The property owner is seeking a variance to allow for permit to be issued.

 

Subject Property Zoning/Land Use

 

Existing Zoning

Existing Use

“C-3 MC-3 AHOD” General Commercial Austin Highway Metropolitan Corridor Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Home

 

Surrounding Zoning/Land Use

 

Orientation

Existing Zoning District(s)

Existing Use

North

“C-3 MC-3 AHOD” General Commercial Austin Highway Metropolitan Corridor Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Home

South

“I-1 MC-3 AHOD” General Commercial Austin Highway Metropolitan Corridor Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Home

East

“I-1 MC-3 AHOD” General Commercial Austin Highway Metropolitan Corridor Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Home

West

“C-3 MC-3 AHOD” General Commercial Austin Highway Metropolitan Corridor Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Home

 

Comprehensive Plan Consistency/Neighborhood Association

 

The subject property is not within the boundaries of a Neighborhood or Community Plan. The subject property is not located within a Neighborhood Association.

 

Street Classification

 

Austin Highway is classified as a State Highway.

 

Criteria for Review

 

According to Section 35-482(h) of the UDC, in order for special exception to be granted, Board of Adjustment must find that the request meets each of the five following conditions:

 

A.                     The special exception will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the chapter.

The UDC states the Board of Adjustment can grant a special exception for a fence height modification up to 8’. The additional fence height is intended to provide protection and security to the applicant’s property. If granted, this request would be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of the ordinance.  No portions of the fences are in violation of the Clear Vision field.

 

B.                     The public welfare and convenience will be substantially served.

In this case, these criteria are represented by maximum fence heights to protect residential property owners while still promoting a sense of community. The fence height was built along the south and the first 300’ of the west property lines in order to provide additional security and protection for the property. This is not contrary to the public interest. 

 

C.                     The neighboring property will not be substantially injured by such proposed use.

No portion of the fence is in violation of the Clear Vision field. No adjacent property owner, nor the traveling public, will be harmed by the proposed fence.

 

D.                     The special exception will not alter the essential character of the district and location in which the property for which the special exception is sought.

The 6’ fence along the south and the first 300’ of the west property lines would not significantly alter the overall appearance of the district and would be able to provide added security and protection for the property owner.

 

E.                     The special exception will not weaken the general purpose of the district or the regulations herein established for the specific district.

The purpose of the fencing standards is to protect the health, safety, and general welfare of the public. The special exception request is to allow a 6’ fence in order to add security and protection for the subject property. Therefore, the requested special exception will not weaken the general purpose of the district.

 

Alternative to Applicant’s Request

 

The applicant would need to adhere to the permitted fence heights as described in Section 35-514.

 

Staff Recommendation

 

Staff recommends APPROVAL of variance in BOA-19-10300027, based on the following findings of fact:

 

1.                     The fence will provide additional privacy and security to the subject property.