city of San Antonio


Some of our meetings have moved. View additional meetings.

File #: 19-3918   
Type: Zoning Case
In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 5/6/2019
Posting Language: BOA-19-10300048: A request by Justin Petersburg for a variance from the requirement that a 6’ tall solid screen fence be provided between commercial and residential properties to allow a 6’ tall wrought iron fence to remain, located at 315 North General McMullen Drive. Staff recommends Approval. (Council District 5) (Mercedes Rivas, Planner, (210) 207-0215, Mercedes.Rivas2@sanantonio.gov, Development Services Department)
Attachments: 1. BOA-19-10300048 Attachments
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Case Number:

BOA-19-10300048

Applicant:

Justin Petersburg

Owner:

O’Reilly Auto Parts, LLC

Council District:

5

Location:

315 North General McMullen Drive

Legal Description:

Lot 25, Block 1, NCB 9024

Zoning:

“C-3 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” General Commercial Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Case Manager:

Mercedes Rivas, Planner

Request

A request for a variance, as described in Section 35-514, from the requirement that a 6’ tall solid screen fence be provided between commercial and residential properties to allow a 6’ tall wrought iron fence to remain.

Executive Summary

The subject property is located at 315 N General McMullen Drive. The applicant wishes to keep a 6’ tall wrought iron fence between the commercial and residential properties. The owner of the residential property directly adjacent to the subject property requested that the wrought iron fence be built instead of the solid screen fence required by code.

 

Code Enforcement History

 

No Code Enforcement history exists on the property.

 

Permit History

 

The applicant is waiting for variances to be approved to obtain a complete building permit and to obtain a Certificate of Occupancy as the owner is operating on a temporary Certificate of Occupancy.

Subject Property Zoning/Land Use

 

Existing Zoning

Existing Use

“C-3 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” General Commercial Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

O’Reilly Auto Parts

 

Surrounding Zoning/Land Use

 

Orientation

Existing Zoning District(s)

Existing Use

North

“C-3 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” General Commercial Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Drainage Ditch

South

“C-3R MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” General Commercial Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Gym Parking Lot

East

“C-2CD MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” General Commercial Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Auto Shop

West

“R-5 MLOD-2 MLR-2 AHOD” Residential District Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 2 Airport Hazard Overlay District

Single-Family Home

Comprehensive Plan Consistency/Neighborhood Association

The property is within the boundaries of the West Sector Plan and is currently designated as “General Urban Tier” in the future land use component of the plan. The subject property is not located within the boundaries of a Neighborhood Association.

Street Classification

North General McMullen Drive is classified as an Arterial.

Criteria for Review

According to Section 35-482(e) of the UDC, in order for a variance to be granted, the applicant must demonstrate all of the following:

 

1.                     The variance is not contrary to the public interest.

 

The public interest is defined as the general health, safety, and welfare of the public. In this case, the fence was built with wrought iron. The fence enhances aesthetics towards public view and meets the permitted fence height. If granted, this request would be harmony with the spirit and purpose of the ordinance. 

 

2.                     Due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.

 

Allowing the applicant to keep the 6’ tall wrought iron fence will help create a safe environment while enhancing aesthetics. Therefore, the public welfare and convenience will be substantially served. 

 

3.                     By granting the variance, the spirit of the ordinance will be observed and substantial justice will be done.

 

Granting the variance will not substantially injure the neighboring properties as the fence will enhance safety and privacy for the subject property and is highly unlikely to injure adjacent properties.

 

4.                     The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized in the district in which the request for a variance is located.

 

The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized in the zoning district.

 

5.                     Such variance will not substantially injure the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property or alter the essential character of the district in which the property is located.

 

The 6’ tall wrought iron fence contributes to the character of the community. The fence will not impose any immediate threat to adjacent properties.

 

6.                     The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located.

 

The unique circumstance in this case is that the owner of the residential property directly adjacent to the subject property requested that the wrought iron fence remain instead of the solid screen fence required by code.

 

Alternative to Applicant’s Request

 

The applicant would need to adhere to the permitted fence height and materials as described in Section 35-514.

Staff Recommendation

 

Staff recommends APPROVAL of the variance in BOA-19-10300048, based on the following findings of fact:

 

1.                     The fence does not visually hinder the adjacent property’s driveway or other motorists view.