DEPARTMENT: Development Services
DEPARTMENT HEAD: Michael Shannon
COUNCIL DISTRICTS IMPACTED: 1
SUBJECT:
Zoning Case Z-2019-10700053
SUMMARY:
Current Zoning: “R-6 NCD-5 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Beacon Hill Neighborhood Conservation Airport Hazard Overlay District
Requested Zoning: “IDZ-1 NCD-5 AHOD” Limited Intensity Infill Development Zone Beacon Hill Neighborhood Conservation Airport Hazard Overlay District with uses permitted for two (2) residential dwelling units
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
Zoning Commission Hearing Date: May 7, 2019
Case Manager: Patricia Franco, Planner
Property Owner: MP2 Urban Development, LLC
Applicant: Michael A. Perez
Representative: Michael A. Perez
Location: 1132 West Mistletoe Avenue
Legal Description: Lot 6 and Lot 7, Block 38, NCB 1847
Total Acreage: 0.143
Notices Mailed
Owners of Property within 200 feet: 64
Registered Neighborhood Associations within 200 feet: Beacon Hill Area Neighborhood Association
Applicable Agencies: None
Property Details
Property History: The property was annexed by the City of San Antonio in 1905 and was part of the original 36 square miles of the 1936 City Limits and was originally zoned as “R-1” Single Family Residence District. The property converted from “R-1” to “R-6” Residential Single-Family District following the adoption of the 2001 Unified Development Code (UDC), established by Ordinance 93881, on May 3, 2001.
Topography: The subject property is not located within the 100-year flood plain.
Adjacent Base Zoning and Land Uses
Direction: North
Current Base Zoning: “R-6”
Current Land Uses: Single-Family Residences
Direction: East
Current Base Zoning: “R-6”
Current Land Uses: Single-Family Residences
Direction: South
Current Base Zoning: “R-6” and “O-2”
Current Land Uses: Single-Family Residences and Offices
Direction: West
Current Base Zoning: “RM-4” and “R-6”
Current Land Uses: Single-Family Residences
Overlay and Special District Information:
"NCD"
The Beacon Hill Neighborhood Conservation District (NCD-5) is an overlay zoning district that contains design guidelines for rehabilitation of existing residential and commercial development. Property owners, together with the Department of Planning and Community Development staff, develop the design guidelines. These guidelines can address building materials, height, size, massing, signage, sidewalk location, etc. A zoning review is performed by the Zoning Section of the Development Services Department.
"AHOD"
All surrounding properties carry the "AHOD" Airport Hazard Overlay District, due to their proximity to an airport or approach path. The "AHOD" does not restrict permitted uses, but can require additional review of construction plans by both the Development Services Department and the Federal Aviation Administration.
Transportation
Thoroughfare: West Woodlawn Avenue
Existing Character: Secondary Arterial Type B 70’-86’
Proposed Changes: None Known
Public Transit: VIA bus routes are within walking distance of the subject property.
Routes Served: 90, 95, 96, 97 and 296
Traffic Impact: A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) determination cannot be determined at this time.
Parking Information: Minimum parking space requirements for Residential-Single Family use is 1space per resident
ISSUE:
None.
ALTERNATIVES:
Denial of the requested zoning change would result in the subject property retaining the present zoning district designations of “R-6”. Low-Density Residential uses include single-family houses on individual lots. The “R-6” Residential Single-Family District allows for a minimum lot size of 6,000 square feet and a minimum lot width of 50 feet, foster family home, nursery (1-acre minimum), public and private schools.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None.
Proximity to Regional Center/Premium Transit Corridor
The property is not located within a Regional Center but is located within the I-10 corridor buffer.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff and Zoning Commission (9-0) recommend Approval.
Criteria for Review: According to Section 35-421, zoning amendments shall be based on the approval criteria below.
1. Consistency:
The subject property is located within the Midtown Neighborhood Plan and is currently designated as “Low Density Residential” in the future land use component of the plan. The requested “IDZ-1” with uses permitted for a density of two (2) units is consistent with the adopted land use designation.
2. Adverse Impacts on Neighboring Lands:
Staff has not found evidence of likely adverse impacts on neighboring lands in relation to this zoning change request. The proposed use is consistent with the established development pattern of the surrounding area.
3. Suitability as Presently Zoned:
The existing “R-6” Single-Family Residential base zoning is an appropriate zoning district is appropriate for the surrounding area. The proposed “IDZ-1” is suitable to the area and provides the opportunity for additional low density residential options with the consideration of two residential dwelling units.
4. Health, Safety and Welfare:
Staff has not found indication of likely adverse effects on the public health, safety, or welfare.
5. Public Policy:
The proposed rezoning does not appear to conflict with the following goals, principles, and objectives of the Midtown Neighborhood Plan:
Objective 2.2: Housing Character
Maintain the historic character of the neighborhoods’ housing while building on the increased demand for area homes to attract reinvestment by new families.
6. Size of Tract:
The subject property is 0.143 acres, which would adequately support two residential dwelling units.
7. Other Factors:
Infill Development Zone (IDZ) provides flexible standards for developments. IDZ is to encourage and facilitate development on vacant, bypassed lands, or the redevelopment of underutilized buildings of structures, within existing built-up areas. IDZ may be approved as either a base zoning district or an overlay zoning district. Standards required in an IDZ district shall apply to either IDZ base zoning or the IDZ overlay district except where otherwise specifically stated. Typically IDZ gives flexibility to parking requirements, lots sizes, and setbacks.
• The applicant’s request meets the Master Plan’s Policy for Growth Management - Policy 1g, because it makes physical improvements on an inner city property encouraging redevelopment and infill development.
• The applicant’s request meets the Master Plan’s Policy for Economic Development - Goal 4, because it targets an area within Loop 410.
• The applicant’s request the Master Plan’s Policy for Neighborhoods - Policy 1a, because it rezones vacant or underutilized property in and around neighborhoods to encourage redevelopment that is compatible in use and intensity with the existing neighborhood.
• The applicant’s request the Master Plan’s Policy for Neighborhoods - Policy 4a, because it preserves and revitalizes housing and promotes targeted infill housing in neighborhoods, particularly older neighborhoods located inside Loop 410.
• The applicant’s request the Master Plan’s Policy for Urban Design - Policy 1d, because it develops criteria and procedures for infill development which will enhance the character of neighborhoods.