|
Case Number: |
BOA 19-10300082 |
|
Applicant: |
Yadira Martinez |
|
Owner: |
Yadira Martinez |
|
Council District: |
6 |
|
Location: |
6626 Winkle Court |
|
Legal Description: |
Lot 16, Block 21, NCB 15531 |
|
Zoning: |
“R-6 MLOD-2 MLR-1 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Military Lighting Region 1 Airport Hazard Overlay District |
|
Case Manager: |
Mercedes Rivas, Planner |
Request
A request for a 4’11” variance from the 5’ side setback requirement, as described in Section 35-310.01, to allow for an existing attached carport to be 1” away from the side property line.
Executive Summary
The applicant is requesting a decrease of the side building setback line to allow for an existing attached carport in order to keep the existing attached carport where it is currently located. The homeowner needs to encroach on the side setback requirement in order for there to be ample space to pull their vehicle into the driveway. The lot directly adjacent to the carport is vacant and is owned by the owner of the subject property. The attached carport was built without permits. The subject property is surrounded by single family residential properties.
Code Enforcement History
On June 18, 2019 the applicant received a code violation for building the carport without a permit and for building the carport within the side building setbacks. The case is currently open.
Permit History
There is no permit history related to the attached carport on the property. The property owner is seeking a variance to allow for permit to be issued.
Subject Property Zoning/Land Use
|
Existing Zoning |
Existing Use |
|
“R-6 MLOD-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use
|
Orientation |
Existing Zoning District(s) |
Existing Use |
|
North |
“R-6 MLOD-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
|
South |
“R-6 MLOD-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
|
East |
“R-6 MLOD-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
|
West |
“R-6 MLOD-2 AHOD” Residential Single-Family Lackland Military Lighting Overlay Airport Hazard Overlay District |
Single-Family Dwelling |
Comprehensive Plan Consistency/Neighborhood Association
The property is not located within a neighborhood, but it is located within the West Sector Plan and is designated as “Suburban Tier.” The subject property is located within the Cable-Westwood Neighborhood Association. As such, they were notified and asked to comment.
Street Classification
Winkle Court is classified as a Local Street.
Criteria for Review
According to Section 35-482(e) of the UDC, in order for a variance to be granted, the applicant must demonstrate all of the following:
1. The variance is not contrary to the public interest.
The public interest is served by setbacks, which help to provide consistent development within the City of San Antonio. The applicant is seeking a variance to allow the existing attached carport to remain 1 inch from the side property line. Allowing the carport to be one inch from the side property line interferes with the character of the neighborhood. Staff finds that the attached carport, as proposed, is contrary to the public interest.
However, a 2’ variance from the 5’ side setback to allow the carport to be 3’ from the side property line may not be contrary to the public interest.
2. Due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of the ordinance would result in unnecessary hardship.
Staff is unable to establish any special condition that warrants reducing the side setback to one inch.
However, a 2’ variance from the 5’ side setback to allow the carport to be 3’ from the side property line may meet the intent of the code and allow for appropriate setbacks with maintenance.
3. By granting the variance, the spirit of the ordinance will be observed and substantial justice will be done.
The spirit of the ordinance is the intent of the Code, rather than the strict letter of the law. In this case, the intent is to provide enough of a setback to allow for long-term maintenance without trespass. The near elimination of the side setback requirement does not provide such clearance and does not observe the spirit of the ordinance.
However, a 2’ variance from the 5’ side setback to allow the carport to be 3’ from the side property line may meet the spirit of the ordinance.
4. The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized in the zoning district in which the variance is located.
The variance will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized by the zoning district.
5. Such variance will not substantially injure the appropriate use of adjacent conforming property or alter the essential character of the district in which the property is located.
The placement of an attached carport one inch from the side property line is contrary to the essential character of the district.
However, a 2’ variance from the 5’ side setback to allow the carport to be 3’ from the side property line may not injure the adjacent property.
6. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located.
Staff is unable to determine any unique circumstance existing on the site that warrants the near elimination of the side setback requirement.
However, a 2’ variance from the 5’ side setback to allow the carport to be 3’ from the side property line may allow for appropriate setbacks and maintenance.
Alternative to Applicant’s Request
Denial of the variance request would result in the owner having to meet the required five foot side setback.
Staff Recommendation
Staff recommends DENIAL with an Alternate Recommendation of a 2’ variance from the 5’ side setback to allow an attached carport to be 3’ from the side property line in 19-10300082, based on the following findings of fact:
1. The existing attached carport is contrary to the public interest in that it detracts from the essential character of the community.