city of San Antonio


Some of our meetings have moved. View additional meetings.

File #: 19-6016   
Type: Zoning Case
In control: Zoning Commission
On agenda: 8/20/2019
Posting Language: ZONING CASE Z-2019-10700153 CD (Council District 7): A request for a change in zoning from "C-2 AHOD" Commercial Airport Hazard Overlay District to "C-2 CD AHOD" Commercial Airport Hazard Overlay District with a Conditional Use for Live Entertainment without cover charge for 3 or more days a week on 2.6786 acres out of NCB 14160, located at 5455 Evers Road. Staff recommends Approval. (Mirko Maravi, Planner (210) 207-0107, mirko.maravi@sanantonio.gov; Development Services Department)
Attachments: 1. Location Map, 2. Site Plan
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

DEPARTMENT: Development Services                     

 

DEPARTMENT HEAD: Michael Shannon

                     

COUNCIL DISTRICTS IMPACTED: 7

 

SUBJECT:

Zoning Case Z-2019-10700153 CD

 

SUMMARY:

Current Zoning:  "C-2 AHOD" Commercial Airport Hazard Overlay District

 

Requested Zoning:  "C-2 CD AHOD" Commercial Airport Hazard Overlay District with a Conditional Use for Live Entertainment without cover charge for 3 or more days a week

 

BACKGROUND INFORMATION:

Zoning Commission Hearing Date:  August 20, 2019

 

Case Manager:  Mirko Maravi, Planner

 

Property Owner:  Mike Litofsky, AHSATX, LLC

 

Applicant:  James Prince and Jose R. Campos

 

Representative:  James Prince and Jose R. Campos

 

Location:  5455 Evers Road

 

Legal Description:  2.6786 acres out of NCB 14160

 

Total Acreage:  2.6

 

Notices Mailed

Owners of Property within 200 feet:  22

Registered Neighborhood Associations within 200 feet:  None

Applicable Agencies:  Texas Department of Transportation

 

Property Details

Property History:  The subject property was annexed into the City of San Antonio by Ordinance 35997, dated January 11, 1968.  The property was rezoned by Ordinance 36245, dated January 29, 1968 from Temporary “R-1” One-Family Residence District to “B-2” Business District.  Under the 2001 Unified Development Code, established by Ordinance 93881, dated May, 03, 2001, the property zoned “B-2” Business District converted to the current “C-2” Commercial District.

                     

Topography:  The property does not include any abnormal physical features such as slope or incursion in a flood plain.

 

Adjacent Base Zoning and Land Uses

Direction:  North

Current Base Zoning:  “C-2 S” and “C-2”

Current Land Uses:  Commercial uses

 

Direction:  South

Current Base Zoning:  “C-3” and “C-2”

Current Land Uses:  Gas station and other commercial use

 

Direction:  East

Current Base Zoning:  “MF-33” and “C-3”

Current Land Uses:  Apartments and commercial use

 

Direction:  West

Current Base Zoning:  “C-2” and “R-6”

Current Land Uses:  Vacant

 

Overlay and Special District Information: 

"AHOD"

All surrounding properties carry the "AHOD" Airport Hazard Overlay District, due to their proximity to an airport or approach path.  The "AHOD" does not restrict permitted uses, but can require additional review of construction plans by both the Development Services Department and the Federal Aviation Administration.

 

Transportation

Thoroughfare:  Evers Road

Existing Character:  Collector

Proposed Changes:  None Known

 

Public Transit:  VIA bus routes are within walking distance of the subject property.

Routes Served: 88, 607

 

Traffic Impact:  A Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) is not required. The traffic generated by the proposed development does not exceed the threshold requirements.

 

Parking Information:  The minimum parking requirement for a live entertainment venue is 1 space for every 100 square feet.

 

ISSUE:

None.

 

ALTERNATIVES:

Denial of the requested zoning change would result in the subject property retaining the present zoning district designation of “C-2”.  These districts permit general commercial activities designed to serve the community such as repair shops, wholesale businesses, warehousing and limited retail sales with some outdoor display of goods. These districts promote a broad range of commercial operations and services necessary for large regions of the city, providing community balance.  "C-2" districts accommodate commercial and retail uses that are more intensive in character than "NC" and "C-1" uses, and which generate a greater volume of vehicular traffic and/or truck traffic.

 

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

 

PROXIMITY TO REGIONAL CENTER/PREMIUM TRANSIT CORRIDOR:

The subject property is within the Medical Center Regional Center and located within the Premium Transit Corridor. 

 

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends Approval.

 

Criteria for Review:  According to Section 35-421, zoning amendments shall be based on the approval criteria below.

 

1.  Consistency: 

The property is located within the North Sector Plan and is currently designated as “Mixed Use Center in the future land use component of the plan.  The requested base zoning district of “C-2” is consistent with the future land use designation. 

 

2.  Adverse Impacts on Neighboring Lands: 

Staff does not find evidence of likely adverse impacts on neighboring lands in relation to this zoning change request.

 

3.  Suitability as Presently Zoned: 

The current “C-2” Commercial District is an appropriate zoning for the property and surrounding area.  The Conditional Use allows consideration of Live Entertainment with additional conditions if needed.

 

4.  Health, Safety and Welfare: 

Staff has not found indication of likely adverse effects on the public health, safety, or welfare.

 

5.  Public Policy: 

The rezoning request is not within a neighborhood or community plan.

 

6.  Size of Tract: 

The subject property is 2.6 acres, which could reasonably accommodate live entertainment uses.

 

7.  Other Factors: 

The Conditional Use zoning procedure is designed to provide for a land use that is not permitted by the established zoning district, but due to individual site considerations or unique development requirements would be compatible with adjacent land uses under given conditions.