DEPARTMENT: Arts & Culture
DEPARTMENT HEAD: Debbie Racca-Sittre, Director
COUNCIL DISTRICTS IMPACTED: Citywide
SUBJECT:
Briefing and possible action on policies related to Public Art, Design Enhancement, and Art in Private Development
SUMMARY:
Briefing and possible action on policies related to Public Art, Design Enhancement, and Art in Private Development.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
On July 22, 2020, Councilman Treviño submitted a Council Consideration Request (CCR) requesting the creation of a comprehensive Art WORKS Program in San Antonio. This program includes three policy components: 1) Increase City investment in Public Art from 1% to 2% of all eligible capital projects; 2) Develop a Design Enhancement policy; and 3) Develop an Art in Private Development policy. The Culture & Neighborhood Services Committee was briefed on October 5, 2021 and staff is providing follow up to questions from that meeting.
1. Public Art Funding: For over twenty years, the City of San Antonio has allocated public art funding as part of its capital improvement program’s strategy and to take into consideration when art and cultural opportunities can enhance our city’s infrastructure projects, such as streets, drainage, parks, libraries, community facilities, and many more significant capital projects throughout all council districts.
City Council first adopted a policy to fund Public Art at 1% of eligible capital projects in 1996. The policy was rescinded in 1997 and the program was moved from the Department of Arts & Cultural Affairs to Public Works as a design enhancement program. In 2001, City Council approved Public Art & Design Enhancement as a part of the Unified Development Code (UDC) project funds along with all other staff managing the capital program. In 2011, City Council adopted a policy designating 1 % of all eligible capital projects to be set aside for Public Art and the program was moved from Public Works to the Department for Culture and Creative Development (now called the Department of Arts & Culture). The 2012 General Obligation Bond was the first time the 1% public art funds were pooled by proposition to allow for larger art projects.
2. Design Enhancement: Design Enhancement policy creates a program that results in elements of projects designed by an artist/craftsman in collaboration with the project architect, landscape architect, engineer, or contractor. Artists would inform and help guide the design of a capital project with the purpose of making ordinary components of the capital project more beautiful, artistic, and culturally significant.
3. Art in Private Development: The goal of the Art in Private Development Policy is to provide enhanced property values, and an improved appearance of the community through creative and properly maintained privately owned art in public view and provide more economic opportunity for artists. Art in Private Development policies exist in other cities mostly in California.
ISSUE:
1. Public Art: This policy would amend the current Public Art policy to increase the city’s investment in public art from 1% to 2% of all capital improvement projects contained in the City's capital improvement program. Policy would be applicable to all eligible capital projects approved on or after June 1, 2021 and would also include TIF collections. The current Public Art policy would also be updated to include changes in names of departments, commissions, committees and streamlined processes that promote equity, diversity, and transparency. The policy would also create a process for the review and permitting of art projects on City property or right of way when requested by community groups.
2. Design Enhancement: The Public Works Department and the Department of Arts & Culture have started work on a pilot Design Enhancement program. There are nineteen projects identified by Public Works. The Departments have developed parameters for projects that would be appropriate for design enhancement as well as artists contracts and an implementation process. Three projects have started, ten are in the planning phase and six are being analyzed for feasibility.
3. Art in Private Development: This policy is not yet ready for review by the Committee. Governance Committee voted to have this program vetted through the UDC amendment process and reviewed by the Culture & Neighborhood Services and Planning & Community Development Committees after community engagement.
ALTERNATIVES:
No action is requested on Art in Private Development or the Design Enhancement Program. Culture & Neighborhood Services Committee can either move the policy discussion on increasing Public Art investment to full City Council for consideration or recommend no change to the policy.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This item has no fiscal impact. If approved by the Culture & Neighborhood Services Committee, the policy discussion on increasing Public Art investment from 1% to 2% of eligible capital projects contained in the City's capital improvement program would proceed to a City Council B Session.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Public Art: Staff recommends that the policy discussion on increasing Public Art investment from 1% to 2% of eligible capital projects proceed to a B Session.
2. Design Enhancement: Staff recommends continuing with the pilot project and return to Culture & Neighborhood Services Committee with an update on the status of the pilot and recommendations every 6 months.
3. Art in Private Development Policy is much of a larger conversation within the confines of the UDC and should be done as a part of the UDC amendment process.